Saturday, August 17, 2013

I finally have a bone to pick with @ElizabethMay.

I was slow to warm up to Elizabeth May after supporting sitting Ottawa City Councillor David Chernushenko's bid for Federal Green Party Leader in 2006. Seven years later, she's one of Canada's public figures I respect most. Relentless, principled, and poignant, Elizabeth May has been the Green Party's solar-powered Energizer bunny.

Full disclosure, I held a Green Party membership for the first five years of my voting life; I embraced pragmatism living in the Niagara Region 2011 and volunteered for Malcolm Allen to stave off a Conservative win in the Welland battleground riding. I supported Nathan Cullen during the NDP leadership race, but I remain unimpressed with the ONDP and will vote Green Party of Ontario as long as they are the only party to prioritize adopting a single secular school board.

Elizabeth May is usually very much in line with my thoughts on politics, but she finally said something regarding the proposed East-West pipeline I have to vehemently disagree with: build more oil refineries.

(Irving Refinery, Saint John, New Brunswick)

Her rationale, which has a lot of merit, is that it is safer to pump a more refined product across the country to ports of departure. My counter argument to this predicament is that building refineries in Alberta will only artificially increase the longevity of the fossil fuel industry in Canada. The point of the pipeline is that you turn it off when it's no longer economically viable.

An expedient shift away from fossil fuels, especially their import, is high among my priorities for the Canadian economy. Because I aim for the shortest distance to sustainability, I do not support the billions in subsidies the Canadian government hands oil companies, and I do not support the expansion of the refining industry in Canada.

Based on economic logic, we should export oil as long as there is world demand sufficient to generate profit without requiring government subsidy. As clean energies become more economically viable, the market will shift, and fossil fuels will will be too expensive to take out of the ground by comparison. The economy is already shifting toward clean energy, and the private sector in Canada is showing no appetite to build more refineries.

Building new refineries in Alberta would only create jobs with a planned expiry date and pit labour interests against environmentalists when it's time to close the facilities' doors. Using the oil industry to create jobs in Canada makes it harder to choke our reliance on fossil fuels out of out public policies.

By maximizing the resources and facilities Canada already has and re-prioritizing government assistance toward clean energy grids, we can reap the benefits of a robust energy sector and start planing post-oil politics. At the end of it all, I'm just not convinced building refineries to fill the pipeline with a safer product is worth anchoring Canada in the fossil fuel economy any longer than necessary.

Friday, August 2, 2013

Holy #PinkWashing, @CapPride!

I recently found out that Ottawa’s Great Canadian Cabin will be hosting an “Ally Party” as part of Capital Pride 2013
"Queer Ally Party

Presented by Queer Ottawa

The Great Canadian Cabin, 95 York St


Queer Ottawa is proud to be hosting the first-ever Ally Party for Capital Pride 2013. An ally is a heterosexual person who stands with the LGBT community to support and push forward the movement for social equality. Become our ally by attending this inaugural celebration!"

(Copied from Capital Pride Event Listing)

My knee-jerk reaction was: WTF? This is the Pride party for the “allies” seeking a segregated mostly hetero party? And isn't the entirety of a Pride festival an “Ally Party”? Is it not the congregation of diverse peoples in the names of minority inclusion and solidarity that defines Pride? (Maybe I'm being too idealistic with that last assertion)

At the end of the day, the thought process behind an “Ally Party” is not one that strides toward social justice. The notion (re)creates an “us” and a “them”, rather than a “we”.  

I greatly prefer the language of solidarity to allyship. I see too many people relieving themselves of culpability within complex webs of power by misguidedly situating themselves outside of a given injustice. Solidarity recognizes the confluence of struggle across axes of oppression; better language choices include any combination of the following: ‘straight in solidarity’, ‘cis in solidarity’, or ‘settler in solidarity’.

Language politics aside, I would hope all of Ottawa’s bars and clubs would treat queer people with respect on any given day. A straight bar hosting an exceptionally tolerant straight party during Pride isn't a special event; it’s pinkwashing, and no amount of glitter or vodka could convince me this party is a good idea.